Wednesday, 18 December 2013

Unit 3: Law & Order - Should prisoners get the vote?

About 7.000 prisoners would get the vote immediately
under the committee's recommendations
Prisoners serving jail terms of a year or less and those coming to the end of their sentences should be entitled to vote, a cross-party committee of MPs and peers has recommended. Click here to access the full article.

This is a cross party committee, but led b y the Conservative (and my MP) Crispin Blunt. Perhaps another example of Conservatives moving towards a more liberal approach to dealing with criminals.


It also highlights that UK will always look to the European Court of Human Rights when discussing legislation (a unit 4 topic)

Tuesday, 17 December 2013

Unit 2: House of Lords & expenses scandal

Half the members of the House of Lords clock in and out of Parliament for a few minutes a day in order to claim a £300 daily attendance allowance, a former Conservative peer has said.

Click here to access the full piece from the BBC.

Please look at the comments from BBC readers. They make very interesting reading and will help you with your essays on reform of the Lords.

All Politics Students

Thank you to the library for highlighting content of the Politics Review magazine. See below for articles. Essential reading for all of you.....

Politics Review
September  2013 issue
Volume 23, Number 1

Contents:
Page 2:  Pressure groups:  What makes them successful?

Page 6:  Interview:  Jo Swinson MP, Minister for Women.

Page 8:  The Conservative Party:  Why is it divided over policies?

Page 12:  Success at AS:  Edexcel AS Government and Politics:  how to succeed at AS politics.

Page 15:  UK update.

Page 16:  Debate:  Do referendums strengthen democracy in the UK?

Page 18:  US political parties:  Why are they so different?

Page 22:  Conservatism:  Is it an ideology?

Page 26:  Politics at uni:  Politics at Nottingham University.

Page 27:  US update.

Page 28:  UK democracy:  The democratic deficit and democratic renewal.

Page 32:  A2 focus on...:  Super PACs.


Page 34:  Highlights:  The 2011 UK census.

Politics Review
November 2013 issue
Volume 23, Number 2

Contents:

Page 2:  Prime ministerial power:  Has it changed since 1997?

Page 6:  Success at AS:  AQA Government and Politics:  how to succeed at AS.

Page 9:  UK update.

Page 10:  US pressure groups:  Why are some more successful than others?

Page 14:  AS focus on...:  Parliamentary and presidential government.

Page 16:  Debate:  Should the Electoral College be replaced by a national popular vote?

Page 18:  Parliament:  What does it do and how effectively does it do it?

Page 22:  A2 focus on...:  Liberal feminism.

Page 23:  US Update.

Page 24:  Socialism:  Renewal or retreat?

Page 28:  Achieve at A2:  Edexcel Government and Politics:  how to succeed at US politics.

Page 30:  UK electoral systems:  Are they all flawed?

Page 34:  Highlights:  Comparative electoral turnout.

Sunday, 15 December 2013

Unit 3: Law & Order - Ken Clarke Vs Theresa May

Cat fight brings human rights row into the open

Ken Clarke takes on Theresa May and PM, refusing to accept a repeal of the Human Rights Act


Wed 5 Oct 2011

THERE is a serious side to l'affaire du chat that will cause David Cameron headaches long after the last bottle of Bollinger has been downed tonight as the political conference season draws to a close.

First, let's be clear how the cat fight broke out. Home Secretary Theresa May told the Conservative Party conference in Manchester yersterday that she was going to issue new guidance to judges over article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - the right to family life.

To illustrate how ridiculous the law has become, May said - "I'm not making this up" - that one British judge had even refused to deport an illegal immigrant "because he had a pet cat".

Minutes later, Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke said on air he did not believe May's story. He then told a fringe meeting he would bet the Home Secretary a fiver it wasn't true.

The cat fight between May and Clarke has brought a serious Cabinet scrap over the abolition of the Human Rights Action hissing and scratching into the open.

For months, behind the scenes, Clarke has been stubbornly resisting the pressure to roll over and allow the Act to be replaced with a British Bill of rights. No wonder he was called 'the sixth Liberal Democrat' by Nick Clegg at the Lib Dems' party conference.

But May and the prime minister both have their hearts set on the repeal of the HRA and there is an official review going on right now.

Clarke said yesterday he would be "quite content" for May to tinker with the guidance to judges through secondary legislation, but he made it clear at a fringe meeting organised by The Daily Telegraph that he will not let the Act be repealed without a fight. (Incidentally, the Telegraph's editorial today comes out on Ken's side on the matter of the cat, saying May's story does not bear close examination.)

Ken may look like a pussycat, but he has sharp claws. If it comes to a real fight - which is likely - the Mole wouldn't put a fiver on Cameron and May winning. At around 2.30 pm today, Cameron will run down the curtain on the conference season with his own big set-piece speech.

Because the state of the economy has made expensive gestures like tax cuts impossible, he has little to offer but 'mood music' - hope and optimism coupled with a bit of financial realism (pay off your credit cards, just as we are trying to in government).

It would be handy to be able offer hope to the Tory faithful that they will see the end of their hated Human Rights Act. But with Ken on fighting form, will Cameron choose to bring the subject up?

Suggestions for debate: Please look at the HRA and what each party believes or wants to change as far as this act is concerned. 

Thursday, 12 December 2013

Unit 3: Coalition policy on environment

Click here to access link to coalition issues on environment policy.

Sunday, 8 December 2013

Saturday, 7 December 2013

Unit 3: Osbourne's Autumn Statement

Chancellor George Osborne has updated MPs on the state of the economy and the government's future plans in his Autumn Statement. The key points are outlined in this article

Useful application marks for any question on UK Economic Policy.

Friday, 6 December 2013

Unit 3: Mark Schemes for 15 markers

Jun 12 - Why have the coalition government’s policies on policing been controversial?

Coalition policies have included:
· Directly elected police commissioners
· 20% cuts to police budgets by 2015
· 2 year pay freeze and the suspension of bonuses for chief officers

The reforms have been considered controversial for the following reasons:

· The Welsh chief constables argue that directly elected commissioners are not needed
in Wales, as Welsh police authorities are already diverse enough and with the skills needed to represent their communities
· The South Wales Police Authority has already called the plans “unsustainable,
unnecessary and too costly”- the Local Government Association has backed this, with estimated election costs of £50m
· There are fears that elections will lead to commissioners with populist agendas or political extremists being elected
· Budget cuts have led to claims by ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) that up to 8,000 jobs will be lost
· The chair of the Police Federation of England and Wales has argued that the pay freeze and cuts (alongside potential increases in pensions contributions) will devastate the service, leading to a potential 15% reduction in take-home pay- he has also suggested that judicial action may be taken
· Labour have argued that the cuts are going too far and too fast, and will directly affect local communities

Jan 11: To what extent is there disagreement between govt & opposition over policing?

Candidates should demonstrate awareness that there has been a growing consensus on tackling law and order through targeting the causes of crime as well as punishing criminals between the main political parties, but that differences still exist in specific policies.
Under Labour governments, more powers were given to the police. For example, ‘on the- spot’ fines were introduced, greater discretion given to inform local communities about sex offenders in the area, anti-terror laws giving the police more surveillance powers etc .
Broadly speaking, extending police powers- especially with regards to anti-terror legislation- have been supported by the Conservative Party. However, they have expressed concern over the growth of the ‘surveillance state’- David Davis resigned his seat and triggered a by-election in 2007 in protest at this.

In opposition, the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats were broadly in agreement about making the police more accountable to elected individuals or bodies, and devolving responsibility for policing down to a more local level. Both also agreed that there was a need to reduce police bureaucracy.

However, the Conservatives also focus on giving more powers to the police in order to prevent crime, whereas the Liberal Democrats believe there need to be more police on the beat. The Conservatives also pledged to abolish police authorities, where the Liberal Democrats wanted to raise the profiles of police authorities and make them more accountable through elected representatives.

In coalition, they have agreed to:
· Replace police authorities with directly-elected police and crime commissioners are to be introduced in 2012
· Police bureaucracy will be reduced but there is no guarantee that this will avoid reducing police numbers
· Gove police more powers to deal with licensed problems that are causing problems
· Cut funding by £10 million but ring-fence funding for community officers for 2 years
Labour have criticised the additional layer of politicians proposed, and also the funding cuts but have yet to form a comprehensive set of policies under their new leader.

Jan 10: How, and to what extent, has the Conservative Party’s approach to law and order changed in recent years?

Candidates should demonstrate an awareness that some of the themes of Conservative policy on law and order have remained largely unchanged, including:

• Strengthening police powers, especially in terms of stop and search
• The commitment to make “punishment fit the crime” that suggests more offenders going to prison and longer sentences
• The commitment to build sufficient prison places to keep as many people locked up for as long as necessary

However, there have also been new themes in Conservative policy in this area, similar to those traditionally associated with the political left, including:

• Addressing the causes of crime, by putting justice policy in the context of strengthening communities and families – such as improving schools and skills
• Monitoring the use of police surveillance to ensure that civil liberties are not infringed
• Increasing local accountability of the police through direct election of senior officers

Thursday, 5 December 2013

Unit 1 & 2: House of lords reform and democracy

Click here to access the presentation from today's lesson. More on the lords to follow....watch this space.

Wednesday, 4 December 2013

Scottish Independence - What do you think?

Thanks to Jacob for finding this website on Scottish Independence. Sorry it has taken me so long to upload. Please remember when reading this, that it is from the Scottish government and therefore a pro independence website. Click here to access.

What are your thoughts?
What would you vote?

Tuesday, 3 December 2013

Unit 3: Questions on Law & Order

Jan 10: How, and to what extent, has the Conservative Party’s approach to law and order
changed in recent years? (15 Marks)

Jan 11: To what extent is there disagreement between government and opposition parties
over policing? (15 marks)

Jan 12: Why have the coalition government’s policies on policing been controversial? (15 Marks)

Jan 13: How far is there disagreement between the government and the opposition over
policing? (15 Marks)

Jun 10: Explain the arguments for and against the wider use of custodial sentences and
longer prison terms. (15 Marks)

Jun 11: Why has the use of crime statistics been politically controversial? (15 Marks)

Jun 12: To what extent has the consensus on law & order come to an end? (15 Marks)

Jun 13: Explain the arguments for and against the wider use of community sentences for
offenders. (15 Marks)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jan 10: ‘Government policies since 1997 have been very successful in reducing crime.’
Discuss. (45 Marks)

Jan 12 ‘Prison doesn't work.’ Discuss. (45 Marks)

Jan 13: Examine the view that the law and order policies of UK governments focus too much
on punishment and not enough on rehabilitation. (45 Marks)

Jun 10: To what extent have law and order policies since 1997 eroded traditional freedoms in
the UK? (45 Marks)

Jun 11: ‘Since 1997, there has been a growing consensus on law and order policy across the
political spectrum.’ Discuss. (45 Marks)

Jun 13: To what extent have law and order policies since 1997 eroded civil liberties in the UK? (45 Marks)